On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 08:48:54PM -0400, Tavin Cole wrote: > Hm, what about including the MIME type in the CHK URI? Since we have a totally inflexable URI system now - I doubt it. AGL -- I never let my schooling get in the way of my education.
- [freenet-devl] no client metadata in 0.4 CHKs? Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] no client metadata in 0.4 CHK... Mark J. Roberts
- Re: [freenet-devl] no client metadata in 0.4 CHK... Brandon
- Re: [freenet-devl] no client metadata in 0.4 CHK... Brandon
- Re: [freenet-devl] no client metadata in 0.4 CHK... Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] no client metadata in 0.4 CHK... Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] no client metadata in 0.4 CHK... Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [freenet-devl] no client metadata in 0.4 CHK... Tavin Cole
- Re: [freenet-devl] no client metadata in 0.4... Adam Langley
- Re: [freenet-devl] no client metadata in 0.4 CHK... Adam Langley
- Re: [freenet-devl] no client metadata in 0.4 CHK... Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] no client metadata in 0.4 CHK... Adam Langley
- Re: [freenet-devl] no client metadata in 0.4... Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [freenet-devl] no client metadata in 0.4 CHK... Scott Gregory Miller
- Re: [freenet-devl] no client metadata in 0.4 CHK... Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] no client metadata in 0.4 CHK... Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [freenet-devl] no client metadata in 0.4 CHK... Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [freenet-devl] no client metadata in 0.4 CHK... Scott Gregory Miller
PGP signature