Re: [freenet-devl] no client metadata in 0.4 CHKs?

[Brandon]

> Okay, I'm the idiot who started spewing these silly ideas. The resolution
> here was that:
>
>       1) CHKs too small to be split may contain DMI. They are small
>          anyway, so they won't clog the network.
>
>       2) SplitFiles may contain DMI in their separate metadata. The
>          metadata is tiny, so it won't clog the network.

I think it would better to disallow DMI in CHKs altogether. That would
make everything must simpler. You can put the DMI for small CHKs in a
redirect.



_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl