>> On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 08:05:54AM -0500, SiliconZealot wrote: >> Matthew - What of the release builds do you think should be the minimum to >> run freenet? (from a technical/bugfixing/routing viewpoint) >> >> Which Package? 0.5.0.5...etc...
>I don't know. At this point, there are important bugfixes on MAIN that >have not yet been ported to stable. Currently STABLE-branch Last Good Build is set at 515 and UNSTABLE-branch is set at 514.... Bumping to AT LEAST one of the offical releases would help greatly right now, IMHO. 0.5.0.6 came with build 533.............. >> How about raising the Last Good Build to the build found in that package. >> Announce it to everyone a week ahead of time, post it on the website, in >> announce, support, devl, etc. Tell Cofe so he can announce it on TFE and other freesite operators can do the same. >Maybe. >> >> Let's finally clear up some of the OLD FUCKING KNOWN BUGS!!! Some of which >> can definately use up valuable HTL as nodes try to route around old buggy >> nodes. >Like what? Believe it or not, some of us do actually care about old >fucking known bugs. Sorry if I wasn't clear, I am talking about the ones you have already fixed! :-) 70%-80% of nodes are running fairly recent builds anyway, and as long as you give node operators a little time to upgrade first, (1-2 weeks) I am sure they will be happy to do so. >> Then, we'll see how routing does or doesn't improve, and we can discuss >> raising maxHTL from there... >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "fish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2002 3:02 AM >> Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] Getting rid of transient and ipaddress settings >> >> >> > >> > On Sun, 24 Nov 2002, Matthew Toseland wrote: >> > >> > > The network may not be usable enough for it to be any use though (I do >> > > think we should consider raising the maxHTL a bit (35 say?) because of >> > > the network growth - but given the likely large number of pre-0.5.1 >> > > nodes out there, I'm not sure that we can...). I do agree with the >> > > principle that we should make it easier to deploy freenet nodes. >> > >> > honestly, if it improved the retrival probability significantly, I don't >> > think anyone would object to a mandatory at this juncture. Or maybe >> > people would, but you know, it'd make me happy :-p >> > > > - fish _______________________________________________ devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
