On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 11:53:03PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thursday 05 June 2003 03:29 pm, Niklas Bergh wrote:
> > On Mon, 02 Jun 2003, Kjell Rune Skaaraas wrote:
> > > Is it possible, or are there any current plans, to be
> > > able to "group" content together on Freenet, so that
> > > if you are looking at a SSK site with index.html and
> > > page01, page02, page03.html etc, they are in fact only
> > > one "big" CHK file with an internal mapping? This
> > > would make navigation instant once you have loaded the
> > > site, and any DNFs would be a "all or none"-basis.
> >
> > Oh, it's quite possible.  Insert a site as a .zip and hack
> > fproxy to fetch once and browse using it.  It dosn't require
> > any core changes.
> >
> > It's also completely useless.
> 
> This might not be bad for one shot freesites. As they probably aren't sharing 
> any images with other sites and they would be under a CHK address anyway. 
> 
> Probably the most common application where this would be handy would be 
> putting up mirrors of websights that are censored or blocked. If you use KDE 
> you could just get a  .war by archiving the webpage and upload that. (It is 
> the same as thowing it into a .tar.gz and giving it a .war extention so you 
> know there is HTML in there) So then the Konqueror viewers would just see it 
> in the browser. For Windows you could just make a script to uncompress it in 
> a temp location and open a browser there. 
> 
> Maybe someone could make a javascript to do this in Mozilla. Maybe even 
> distribute that with freenet (assuming it is popular) and you could even  put 
> something in FCPtools to make .war files automaticaly. But I see no reason 
> that this type of thing should be intigrated into freenet itself. 

Umm, no. Firstly, platform dependancy. Secondly, there is a reason we
block javascript in fproxy.

-- 
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
GPG key lost in last few weeks, new key on keyservers
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible in him whom we trust

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to