----- Original Message ----- From: "Gordan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 12:25 PM Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] container maximum
> On Tuesday 29 Jul 2003 20:23, Toad wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 04:59:30PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > I think the 1 MB limit is okay. > > > > > > See for example yesterday's TFEE container. It is about 400 KB and it > > > consists of some 3 HTML and 1 CSS that sum up to nearly 2 MB! > > > > This seems like a reasonable argument to allow compressing individual > > files. Anyone want to code it? > > I could easily be tempted. > > However, note that I have never even looked at the Freenet source code yet, so > unless there is a reasonable amount of source code documentation somewhere in > a tangible form somewhere (which I don't think is likely due to the shortness > of the development cycle at the moment, but I'd love to be proven wrong) (no, > this does not include inside people's heads! :-p), it is likely that I would > slow down other developers already on the ball with my questions about the > current code base in the short-ish term. > > If this is acceptable, then please drop me an email off list with the > development "protocol" information (i.e. CVS access, patch submission > procedure, environment hints (e.g. use Forte instead of vi because of XYZ > features that make things easier), etc.). > > > > But I must admit that single-file zipping would be a nicer way to do > > > it. > > I am more in favour of tar.bz2 format. It would be measurably more compact for > compressible data, with little speed penalty to speak of. As a windows user I am not too fond of that idea though.... /N _______________________________________________ devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
