On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 08:37:36PM +0200, Some Guy wrote:
> > Well, if all goes well, I'll have a 3000+ node
> > system up within two months or so :)  Until then the
> > best that I can offer is a 40 node system here.
> > 
> > Best Regards,
> > Drew
> 
> Wow 3000+ nodes would rule!  I remember hearing Intel
> had some cluster they were making available for P2P
> research.
> 
> This is actually a whole new thread, but I was
> wondering if lots of nodes could be simulated without
> lots of machines.  So far I've only thought of these
> options:
> 1) I suppose you could run several nodes on different
> ports on a lan, though you'd have to find some way of
> simulating delay.
> 2) Ideally we could write a test application that
> would share routing and maybe caching code the real
> deal, but simulate the network and skip the crypto. 
> Then you'd just need one machine with butt load of
> RAM.

It would be so inaccurate as to be of little use for simulating
NGRouting, which is deeply sensitive to network conditions. OTOH it
could maybe yield some interesting results elsewhere.

> 3) Start a seperate simulation project and pray you
> keep the logic of the code the same.
> 
> #2 sounds the hardest, but the best.  Everytime
> someone suggests some tweak in alchemy or algorthim,
> he could test it himself, kind of like that Rudi guy. 
> What ever happened to him and SVM?
> 
> __________________________________________________________________
> 
> Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - http://mail.yahoo.de
> Logos und Klingelt?ne f?rs Handy bei http://sms.yahoo.de
> _______________________________________________
> devl mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

-- 
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to