On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 01:04:25AM +0000, Toad wrote: > AFAICS, NGRouting should have *more* obvious specialization than classic > routing, because of the relatively small amount of information in the > estimators. Classic routing allowed many tiny specializations - > NGRouting doesn't understand such things, it's about a big dip in the > graph, or maybe two big dips in the graph. And we did see obvious > specialization in the classic routing once upon a time. Exactly, which just plain isn't happening. I've run a fresh unstable node for the past week and even though I have pcaching enabled (even though the store isn't anywhere near 90% full yet), in the 16 buckets diagram none of the bars have a count/mean outside of the 0.875 to 1.125 range.
(the node is accepting about 20% of incoming requests, so the theory that requests aren't getting handled by the most favoured node sounds viable to me) -- Frank v Waveren Fingerprint: 21A7 C7F3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]|stack.nl|dse.nl] ICQ#10074100 1FF3 47FF 545C CB53 Public key: hkp://wwwkeys.pgp.net/[EMAIL PROTECTED] 7BD9 09C0 3AC1 6DF2 _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
