On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 03:46:19PM -0800, Martin Stone Davis wrote: > Toad wrote: > > >On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 11:00:27PM +0100, Thomas Themel wrote: > > > >>Hi, > >> > >>my node is currently running off an ISDN link, and it seems to build up > >>pretty high values in the connection manager's 'Data waiting to be > >>transfered' counter. It's constantly around 30MiB, and that's more than > >>the > >>link can do in an hour under optimal conditions - I don't believe this > >>makes sense. Or does it? > >> > >>Is there any way to get more sensible numbers? > >> > >>I've tried opening a lot of freesites, and they always seem to restart. > >>However, some give me the "The request couldn't even make it off of your > >>node." message, on a node that wasn't reseeded for months. > >> > >>Is this related? > >> > >>I get the feeling that the behaviour has worsened in recent versions, it > >>used to work nicely around 632x. > > > > > >I suspect this is because we reinstated the QR based on bandwidth code. > > Can you explain how that follows? I remember that before that code was > reinstated, I had 300-400 transmitting connections, and my output bw of > trailers was reduced down to about 50% of total. Now I trasmit on about > 30 connections and the trailer bw is about 90% of total.
No. Bandwidth, # transfers, is better. Routing is worse. > > I agree that it's a problem if we really are queueing up more trailers > than we can send in an hour. But how will removing the QR based on > bandwidth help? > > -Martin -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
