Matthew Toseland wrote: >> 1. The platform for this type of thing is a small mobile device, >> getting Freenet to work well on an iPhone would be a world of pain - >> and doesn't buy anything for us > > No, to do that requires a massive amount of short range bandwidth. Phones do > not have this.
Bluetooth? > Not true IMHO. A lot of existing Freenet apps deal with long term requests, > which would work very nicely with sneakernet. Which apps do you have in mind? I can't think of any Freenet app that would be useful with a ten-day delay between requesting a [KSU]SK and finding out which CHK it redirects to, and then another ten days to request the top block of the splitfile, and then another ten days for the data. > I see it more as a long term, attack resistant, scalable solution for general > communication in places where Freenet-over-UDP doesn't work. That would be a very valuable system, I just don't see what it's got to do with Freenet. Cheers, Michael _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
