On Tuesday 14 April 2009 15:33:04 Daniel Cheng wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Matthew Toseland
> <t...@amphibian.dyndns.org> wrote:
> > On Sunday 12 April 2009 12:31:55 Daniel Cheng wrote:
> >> On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Ian Clarke <i...@locut.us> wrote:
> >> > On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Matthew Toseland
> >> > <t...@amphibian.dyndns.org> wrote:
> >> >> On Saturday 11 April 2009 15:39:54 Daniel Cheng wrote:
> >> >>> Hi all,
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I have just checked, GitHub allow "non-fast forward" update, and 
there
> >> >>> is no option to disable it. This means anybody have write access to 
it
> >> >>> might overwrite the whole repository, keeping no history behind. (for
> >> >>> those who are curious, google the 'git push --force').
> >> >>
> >> >> Would that be propagated when devs update their local trees via pull?
> >> >
> >> > No, apparently it would be trivial for a developer to push the history
> >> > back to the repository, since everyone will have a copy of the entire
> >> > repo history (unlike with svn).
> >> >
> >> > I think it basically means that if a developer is determined to be
> >> > malicious, they can definitely be a nuisance - but not cause any
> >> > significant loss of data.  This is probably also the case with
> >> > subversion, and any other source control system.
> >> >
> >>
> >> If any developer do this in git, he will be discovered when next 
developer
> >> try to push any changes.
> >
> > Well yes, but the more subtle attack of deleting history??
> >
> 
> Deleteing / Rewriting the history without being discover require
> finding a meaningful SHA-1 hash collision. Although SHA-1 is not that
> strong, collision attack on SHA-1 is still far from realistic.
> 
> In any other cases, the attack will be discovered in the next push.

They will be discovered *automatically* ?

> The question is: can the attacker do anything harmful in that time gap?
> 
> [[ I don't think we should take this risk. ]]

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to