On Tuesday 28 July 2009 20:32:45 you wrote: > On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Matthew > Toseland<t...@amphibian.dyndns.org> wrote: > >> To do what is proposed (change the download button/text depending on the > >> user-agent/OS), you need redirects: not dynamic page generation. > >> > > Okay so there is a cheap solution as long as we have access to the server > > config. Great. > > Where are you getting this idea that we're somehow going to save lots > of $$$ by going with a static-only web host? Is there even such a > thing as a static-only web host in this day and age (except Freenet > itself of course)?
AFAICS no. I'm not saying we should go with a static only host, I'm saying we shouldn't make dynamic that which doesn't need to be, on grounds of CPU cost (which determines responsiveness in practice). Modern systems (even apache 2 to a reasonable degree) can serve static content ridiculously fast, that's not true of dynamic content.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl