On 2010/11/04 (Nov), at 11:06 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote: On Wednesday 03 November 2010 20:00:48 Robert Hailey wrote:Example patch attached. Small, but untested! I would still like to discuss/theorize on the recent topics, but I've observed some more unexpected behavior and think I found a bigger and more directly-responsible bug: Suppose our node is mostly-idle That is, none are in a opennet grace period (which would keep them connected) We lose one peer... A short time later, the node starts an announcer to "top off" our peer connections (+1 is easy, right?). No... Twelve announcement replies come back and displace all of our veteran peers (patch attached) -- Robert Hailey |
dont_clobber_on_top_off.patch
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
