On Friday 16 Nov 2012 14:20:35 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > Sorry for being late to the discussion. I just now realized this: > > Infocalypse uses SSKs for the top-level keys and I don’t feel competent to > change it to use another type of key. So it would be extremely important for > me to have a compatibility layer which allows infocalypse to use SSKs exactly > as it uses them now. > > Otherwise I don’t know if I would be able to keep it running (and I did not > see djk around for quite some time). And using Mercurial over Freenet is a > very important usecase of Freenet for me.
I might re-implement SSKs via PSKs, but the effect would be the same. Certainly we'd want to keep some kind of SSKs. The payload size might not be exactly the same though. Do you need a specific block size?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
