Am Sonntag, 18. November 2012, 21:01:02 schrieb Matthew Toseland: > On Sunday 18 Nov 2012 02:58:55 you wrote: > > Wait, we're not going to maintain backward compatibility with SSKs? That > > doesn't seem wise... > > Current proposal in a nutshell: > - Support existing SSKs for back compatibility. > - New ECC-based PSKs, programmable, allowing all sorts of things including > multi-writer SSKs for semi-moderated forums. - New SSKs a special case of > PSKs. > - Several block sizes: ~ 800B (fit an insert in one packet; ideal for e.g. > FLIP real-time chat; store in SSK datastores); ~ 2KB (fill one old > SSK-datastore slot; ideal for forums etc), ~ 32KB (fit in one CHK store > slot; useful for forum maintenance etc, and more efficient than a separate > CHK). No other block sizes as they'd be problematic storage-wise.
Nice! Thanks for your summary! Best wishes, Arne -- Konstruktive Kritik: - http://draketo.de/licht/krude-ideen/konstruktive-kritik
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
