On Tuesday 08 Jan 2013 14:00:37 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > Am Dienstag, 8. Januar 2013, 11:42:48 schrieb Matthew Toseland: > > > But I think I forgot, that it is not reinserted, when the request succeeds > > > from cache… > > > > Successful requests are reinserted randomly. > > That’s nice! So as long as something is in the caches it is at least > potentially healed (if people request it).
Yes but with low probability. Actually there are several such mechanisms... > > Right. Although healing is usually not comprehensive. > > What do you mean by that? That healing is hard to explain? I mean we often don't heal every block that is eligible to be healed. > > > > I assume we cannot just tell another node to handle the insert (I am not > > > the location you seek :) )… because that node would just return the > > > insert to us. > > We will usually continue to route it anyway. But we won't store it, meaning > > it has less redundancy. > > So we can actually tell another node to handle the request, even if we are > the > best location? Yes, inserts continue until they run out of HTL.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
