On 10/09/15 09:35, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 10. September 2015, 10:12:19 schrieb xor: >> There was someone on IRC whose Freenet wasn't working because it was >> build01217. He got that because our SF account still labels that as latest. > That’s horrible. The user also checked the version on our site, and > since it was 0.7.5, too, he or she used the SF link. > > I think we should take this as a strong cue to at least release 0.7.6 > the next few months, and then increment the version number *at least* > whenever there are changes which can cause older versions to no longer > connect. I did that once. Ian got really angry. Granted it's not really his decision any more. But he's right, isn't he? Versions are for marketing, not for change tracking?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
