On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Florent Daigniere < [email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 10:11 -0600, Ian wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 9:27 AM, Florent Daigniere < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Tor and its ecosystem is a better example... > > > Tor is a much more mature project than Freenet, > > Well, it's not older > You know that's not what "mature" means. > > with vastly more resources, > > Sure, but that's also by choice and thanks to a consistent strategy > (funding wise if nothing else). > In what way is that "by choice"? > > and a much simpler underlying design, because ultimately it's solving > > a > > simpler problem. > > A simpler problem for which they've found a variety of users (and the > associated sponsors). > Yes, so? We don't because we chose not to. We could have settled on a simpler > problem; Sure, there are an infinity of other problems we could have settled on, but then that wouldn't be Freenet. > Any of the above is superior to what we're doing at the moment (chose > not to have a strategy and an absent leader). > Find someone better to coordinate the project and I'll happily step-aside in a heartbeat. Ian. _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
