On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 10:11 -0600, Ian wrote: > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 9:27 AM, Florent Daigniere < > nextg...@freenetproject.org> wrote: > > > > Tor and its ecosystem is a better example... > > > > Tor is a much more mature project than Freenet,
Well, it's not older > with vastly more resources, Sure, but that's also by choice and thanks to a consistent strategy (funding wise if nothing else). > and a much simpler underlying design, because ultimately it's solving > a > simpler problem. A simpler problem for which they've found a variety of users (and the associated sponsors). > Sure, it would be great to have those advantages, but we > don't. > We don't because we chose not to. We could have settled on a simpler problem; or catered for specific user-communities that actually need such a technology (and could sponsor) OR decide that we don't need/want funding and make-do with (intentionally) limited resources. Any of the above is superior to what we're doing at the moment (chose not to have a strategy and an absent leader). Florent
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
