On Saturday, April 30, 2016 01:20:56 AM [email protected] wrote: > Warning: Non-techie speaking. ;) > > Briefly seen through your work. > Regarding considering improvements for the future, maybe it's a good idea to > also concider the prospect of exchanging freenet's/WOTs crypto algorithm > with post-quantum cryptography solutions figured out by pqcrypto.org . It > probably won't make the used algorithm process faster than it is now, but > would highen the user's tolerance for waiting relative long. Then users > would thing 'gosh, that lasts long, but hey, it's quantum secure, so what > do you want...'. I mean we have the year 2016 now and reports from > australia present the prospect of 2018 to be the year in which the first > universal quantum computer will be ready. > > Here's a great introduction video for what pqcrypto is doing to make sure > we'll also have secure systems when the era of universal quantum computers > starts. Title: djb, Tanja Lange: PQCHacks > Video link: https://youtu.be/-LlkJZJ5DMQ > discription: A gentle introduction to post-quantum cryptography > This is a talk of the cutting edgy group working on securing working crypto > in post-quantum era (starting btw. 2018-2027). A lot of smart heads meet > every year for this and this talk sums up the status quo, gives a preview > into the future and provides useful information for implementing practical > (but not optimal) post-quantum cryptography solutions right now. > > Most recent infos of pqcrypto: Their 2016 conference, which took place 2 > months ago - https://pqcrypto2016.jp/
Thanks! WoT does not do any cryptography at all, crypto is fully encapsulated
in the Freenet core layer ("fred"). I currently do not work on that.
Thus, if you want to get this noticed, you should start a separate thread.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
