I am not sure that I understand what you are suggesting here... Which part of the crypto do you want to change and why?
Florent On Fri, 2016-05-06 at 10:29 +0200, [email protected] wrote: > Yesterday Whonix developer tweeted a sub website of Whonix where > Whonix and Tor position > to post quantum cryptography was briefly explained. The Tor Project > are planning to > migrate to quantum resistant ciphers by version 0.2.9.x – currently > the Tor Project is at > version 0.2.8.2: https://www.whonix.org/wiki/PQCrypto > > --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --- > Von: [email protected] > Datum: 30.04.2016 02:00:05 > An: Discussion of development issues <[email protected]> > Betreff: [freenet-dev] Post-quantum cryptography, was: Re: > RFC: My Web of Trust bachelor's thesis / developer's manual > > > > > On Saturday, April 30, 2016 01:20:56 AM [email protected] wrote: > > > > > > Warning: Non-techie speaking. ;) > > > > > > Briefly seen through your work. > > > Regarding considering improvements for the future, maybe it's a > > > good > > idea to > > > > > > also concider the prospect of exchanging freenet's/WOTs crypto > > > algorithm > > > > > > with post-quantum cryptography solutions figured out by > > > pqcrypto.org > > . It > > > > > > probably won't make the used algorithm process faster than it is > > > now, > > but > > > > > > would highen the user's tolerance for waiting relative long. Then > > > users > > > > > > would thing 'gosh, that lasts long, but hey, it's quantum secure, > > > so > > what > > > > > > do you want...'. I mean we have the year 2016 now and reports > > > from > > > australia present the prospect of 2018 to be the year in which > > > the > > first > > > > > > universal quantum computer will be ready. > > > > > > Here's a great introduction video for what pqcrypto is doing to > > > make > > sure > > > > > > we'll also have secure systems when the era of universal quantum > > > computers > > > > > > starts. Title: djb, Tanja Lange: PQCHacks > > > Video link: https://youtu.be/-LlkJZJ5DMQ > > > discription: A gentle introduction to post-quantum cryptography > > > This is a talk of the cutting edgy group working on securing > > > working > > crypto > > > > > > in post-quantum era (starting btw. 2018-2027). A lot of smart > > > heads > > meet > > > > > > every year for this and this talk sums up the status quo, gives a > > > preview > > > > > > into the future and provides useful information for implementing > > > practical > > > > > > (but not optimal) post-quantum cryptography solutions right now. > > > > > > Most recent infos of pqcrypto: Their 2016 conference, which took > > > place > > 2 > > > > > > months ago - https://pqcrypto2016.jp/ > > Thanks! WoT does not do any cryptography at all, crypto is fully > > encapsulated > > > > in the Freenet core layer ("fred"). I currently do not work on > > that. > > > > Thus, if you want to get this noticed, you should start a separate > > thread. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Devl mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > [email protected] > https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
