On Sat, 2016-08-06 at 21:12 +0200, [email protected] wrote: > On Saturday, August 06, 2016 07:58:30 PM Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > > > > If not, then how about setting a deadline (like august 11th, in one > > week) and after that deadline checking how people perceive the > > value of > > redesigning the website. > > The poll algorithm does *not* work like that. > The stage we are at is *not* the last one. There will be one more > stage (of 1 > week as well). > > The last stage will be to have another vote about estimated cost of > development. > I.e. in this stage now, we vote for how valuable / important / useful > the > tasks are. > In the next stage, we will vote on how much money everyone estimates > their > development to consume. > > The decision on what to do first will then be made as: > Divide average task value by average estimated cost. > Sort by the result. Do the thing with the highest value/cost first. > > So we would first to the things which have the "most bang for the > buck", i.e. > highest value per cost. >
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consensus_decision-making#CriticismFlorent
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
