On 27/11/16 21:08, [email protected] wrote: > On Sunday, November 27, 2016 09:29:45 PM Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: >> [email protected] writes: >>> There are some tough administrative decisions remaining to make about >>> stage 3, namely which voters to exclude from stage 3 because they look >>> like a sybil attack. >> I don’t like this behind-closed-doors-guessing-about-sybil. > That's OK, here's what happened: > While most participants of the poll from IRC have been known in the community > for years, 70% of the anonymous FMS participants created their identity > within > a month of the poll's announcement, as measured by my instance of FMS which > has been running for years. > > Now one might say that this is conclusive enough and I should just publish > the > results without the sybils.
Yes, you should. Give the process a chance. > But the initial problem which this thread is about doesn't stop there: > There will most certainly be some controversy about what to do first because > a > poll of something like 70 items will certainly not cause any winner with a > big > majority, it will be a close call. > > So someone has to make a decision then. And then we're again left with the > initial problem: Ian doesn't seem to have the time to make decisions. > > And even if he does: > Then we decided for *one* thing to do first. So we start it, and it is > finished some day. > And then we *again* need to decide what to do next. > And then Ian again has no time. > So we repeat this 70 times now or what? I'd be very surprised if $25K got that far...
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
