Brandon wrote: > > > Yet another reason for onion routing, I guess. (the caching of the document > > would start at the end of the onion, since our local node cannot see the > > data > > anyway - the onion starts at the client, doesn't it?) > > There would be caching on both endpoints but not in between. An onion
Isn't this just plain dangerous? If someone did enough traffic analysis to suspect that our node initiated an onion-route request for a particular document, then they could back up their evidence with a request for that document to our node with a htl of 1. If the onion started at the client however, then our node would never have even seen the data, so a request to our node for the suspected document would probably be negative. _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
