On Fri, Aug 18, 2000 at 11:42:26AM +1200, Stephen Blackheath wrote: > All righty, > > Content-Type=text/plain it is - Out the window with RFC1945. We will also > need to specify how Unicode characters are dealt with - we could use the > Java way (\uXXXX). > > In a couple of days, I'll have time to write a short doc about it.
Unicode... Why don't we just stick with ASCII (which is *far* easier to support that Unicode)? And why do we have to do something a certain way because an RFC says so? And this particular RFC you pointed out was HTTP/1.0 (which is not Freenet)? And what is the real problem with <name>=<value> notation? -- Travis Bemann Sendmail is still screwed up on my box. My email address is really bemann at execpc.com. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 1081 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20000817/b039030b/attachment.pgp>
