On Thu, Aug 17, 2000 at 07:14:56PM -0400, Travis Bemann wrote: > > Unicode... Why don't we just stick with ASCII (which is *far* easier > to support that Unicode)? And why do we have to do something a > certain way because an RFC says so? And this particular RFC you > pointed out was HTTP/1.0 (which is not Freenet)? And what is the real > problem with <name>=<value> notation?
ASCII stinks. Freenet assumes that all text is UTF8 encoded unicode. That includes fieldnames and values in node-node messages, so if you are still planning to write a node it's time you got yourself a UTF8 encoder/decoder. > > -- > Travis Bemann > Sendmail is still screwed up on my box. > My email address is really bemann at execpc.com. -- \oskar _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
