> I'm not now advocating using RFC1945 - I have obviously been overruled.
We might as well stick as close to possible to RFC1945 when applicable. I think a minor change is no big deal considering the fact that no one else is even attempting to follow standards and we don't need to be interoperable with RFC1945 compliant software. > English. Far better to support Unicode from the outset than have to > kludge it in later. It's not as if it's difficult. Last I heard, Lee Daniel Crocker was working on unicodifying the ununicodified, which wasn't all that much. But he's disappeared since then. _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
