> I think you're a better programmer than you are a diplomat. > > Look, I'm not trying to tread on anyone's toes here. I'm not trying to > interfere in the development of freenet. I am trying to develop a music > sharing system to keep the Napster-loving hordes away from freenet until > it's ready for them. I thought this was something the core developers > wanted. Maybe I should have asked these questions first: > > 1) Is a music-only client worth pursuing, given that it may take developer > time away from freenet proper? Client, maybe, server no. Your proposal is *far* overblown if it wants to be a music-client.
> > 2) Is it still worth pursuing if it requires the development of a music-only > node / protocol? Absulutely not. Scott -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20000728/e44563f9/attachment.pgp>
