> An abstraction layer would be quite nice. It would make Freenet > versatile enough to work well over things like *phone lines/VoIP* > (geez, would tunnelling Freenet through VoIP by simulating modem tones > be really necessary?) or packet radio.
Hmmm... interesting thought, 'dat. Let's see... you have 12 tones.. not much to work with. But let's assume you pulse them at 1ms intervals... so we'll get 12 * 10^3.. or 1500 bits per second.. that equates to exactly 1 TCP/IP packet per second. Hey.. it's doable... > By the way, is this the Signal 11 from Slashdot? ;) Yeah.. but I'm a reformed man. Honest. You guys ain't handing out karma points for the best diff patch, are 'ya? :) Long story about slashdot and me.. and not one to discuss on this list! More seriously, I decided it was time to put my money where my mouth is and contribute something to the community. Freenet seemed the logical choice because if it succeeds it will mean the end of censorship. A noble goal, and certainly one worthy of my time! All this stuff is fun.. it's an escape from my job. I don't know jack about Java though so I'll likely be one of the first people to recode Freenet for C++. heh. -- Signal 11 -o- BOFH, malign.net Who cares how corrupt our leaders are as long as they're tough on crime? _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
