>Yes, but weakening the system for people who don't care at the expense of >those that do is never an option.
The means of security is * not * knowing where the data is stored, in addition to the requester of the information being masked. If you analyze traffic flow through enough nodes at various points, you have a reasonably good map of the network. ( Port scanners and sniffers are a dime a dozen for any operating system. ) * IF * input or retrival of information through freenet is a security hazard - then what is the purpose of freenet again ? _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl >From - Tue Apr 24 09:40:19 2001 Return-Path: <devl-admin at freenetproject.org> Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (postfix@[4.18.42.11]) by funky.danky.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA01363 for <danello at danky.com>; Mon, 23 Apr 2001 19:04:52 -0400 Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hawk.freenetproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB85C57FED; Mon, 23 Apr 2001 16:46:08 -0700 (PDT) Delivered-To: devl at freenetproject.org Received: from blueyonder.co.uk (pcow025o.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.53.125]) by hawk.freenetproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BB7157D97 for <devl at freenetproject.org>; Mon, 23 Apr 2001 16:45:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bagrat42 ([213.48.123.172]) by blueyonder.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.687.68); Tue, 24 Apr 2001 00:41:24 +0100 Received: from toad by bagrat42 with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 14rpv6-0003Oe-00 for <devl at freenetproject.org>; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 00:39:04 +0100 To: devl at freenetproject.org
