On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 11:29:41PM -0000, David Childers wrote: > > >Yes, but weakening the system for people who don't care at the expense of > >those that do is never an option. > > The means of security is * not * knowing where the data is stored, in > addition to the requester of the information being masked. > > If you analyze traffic flow through enough nodes at various points, > you have a reasonably good map of the network. ( Port scanners and > sniffers are a dime a dozen for any operating system. ) > > * IF * input or retrival of information through freenet is a security hazard > - then what is the purpose of freenet again ?
Pardon me, but what was your argument again? From what I read you said that you wanted extra functionality (live streaming) at the expense of Freenets anonymity protections. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20010423/d1eafd6c/attachment.pgp>
