On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 11:01:55AM -0600, Mark J Roberts wrote: > And that, I'm afraid, can't be accomplished within Freenet in any > way that I can imagine.
A incoming connection is put into the OCM and will be reused for outgoing connections if still up. If we can keep it up and multiplex on it we're in business, Correct me if I wrong, and if I am that functionality could be implemented, too. > Yet it can't simply be done with a few > centralized servers either, since these things are great traffic > peepholes and the FBI better be kept far away if anyone wants to be > anonymous. In other words, we need a distributed network. Not so concerned by FBI in Sweden at least not for the time being. Central servers is not needed just a friend with a friendly node on the outside. > network commies wouldn't be running a NAT if they thought the users > were entitled to run servers. Whoa, Telcos and FBI are commies, I though they were capitalist companies and defenders of captalism, is it me or american politics that is confused. :-) /g?ran -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 239 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20011220/71df77f7/attachment.pgp>
