> One final word of advice: A UDP based bearer transport will suck. > It will be hard to implement robustly (congestion control, etc), > it will have lower performance (probably much lower) than TCP, > and I would only use this for dual NAT situations.
Everyone probably knows this already but the Digital Fountain Tornado Codes transport uses UDP with very high troughput. This would probably be a good thing to use sometime, but I guess that is something for a freenet 2.0.. -- | Are ?rseth | elrond at idi.ntnu.no | http://ctemp.dhs.org/ | | tlf: 73886876 | mob: 410 00548 _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
