On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 04:24:57PM -0400, Tavin Cole wrote: > On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 10:08:12PM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 11:58:22AM -0700, Scott Miller wrote:
> > > > > I agree that it may be too strong. Perhaps you should drop it if it > > > > > exceeds some percentage of the total number of refs. I do like the > > > > > 'deleting from the top end' though. > > > > > > > > Et tu Brute! > > > Come on, you have to admit its an interesting solution to both traffic > > > balancing and the ubernode problem. It might also shake up the system a > > > little by causing entrenched nodes to re-evaluate the routes by having > > > to find alternate routes for keys going to the most popular route in > > > their datastore. > > > > The percentage thing is too arbitrary, it rubs me the wrong way. > > > > My reaction, though, was to both of you presenting these as solutions to > > the honest cancer issue, given the first rule. > > Oh, come on. This is not about "distrusting" a node... If you use it as a way to keep a node from fucking with you, then yes it is. -- 'DeCSS would be fine. Where is it?' 'Here,' Montag touched his head. 'Ah,' Granger smiled and nodded. Oskar Sandberg oskar at freenetproject.org _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
