On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 12:00:15AM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote: > On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 05:52:12PM -0400, Tavin Cole wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 11:31:20PM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote: > <> > > > Yes, but it doesn't stop one party from having more references than > > > other parties, so it cannot be considered to address honest cancers at > > > all. > > > > You mean network-wide? It certainly does deter one party from having > > more references than another within the same node. And don't you think > > it would therefore be a deterrent, network-wide? > > > > The operator of an honest cancer node would really have to walk a > > tightrope to keep a presence in as many other nodes' routing tables > > as possible, yet without becoming the local ubernode too rapidly. > > Tavin, one party can be any number of nodes...
Yes, yes. I think we have been arguing about slightly different scenarios here.. fagetaboutit Well, we can at least make the network safe from script kiddies.. -- # tavin cole # # "Technology is a way of organizing the universe so that # man doesn't have to experience it." # # - Max Frisch _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
