On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 05:52:12PM -0400, Tavin Cole wrote: > On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 11:31:20PM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote: <> > > Yes, but it doesn't stop one party from having more references than > > other parties, so it cannot be considered to address honest cancers at > > all. > > You mean network-wide? It certainly does deter one party from having > more references than another within the same node. And don't you think > it would therefore be a deterrent, network-wide? > > The operator of an honest cancer node would really have to walk a > tightrope to keep a presence in as many other nodes' routing tables > as possible, yet without becoming the local ubernode too rapidly.
Tavin, one party can be any number of nodes... -- 'DeCSS would be fine. Where is it?' 'Here,' Montag touched his head. 'Ah,' Granger smiled and nodded. Oskar Sandberg oskar at freenetproject.org _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
