> No, you've got it all wrong. The solution to the puzzle gives you an > insertion address, and the email recipient only checks valid > addresses. So you dont have to filter any spam at all, since anything put > in those valid spots should have been put there by a human.
Right, sorry, I was talking about Ian-style think cash becuase up to 5 minutes ago I thought that's what everyone else was talking about as well. Your style of think cash is pretty groovy. I wouldn't call it think cash since it's not being used as an exhaustible token. I'd call it something like puzzle addressing. But it's still pretty groovy. Now you just need to suggest a puzzle which is machine generatable, not machine solvable, and not too obnoxious. _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
