On Tue, 1 May 2001, Travis Bemann wrote: > 2. Does not require any Java or Javascript or any other sort of smart > content.
Think cash requires a client that understands think cash. > 3. Does not make freenet-mail even slower. Solving think cash is slow. But reading hundreds of thousands of spam messages a day is also slow. Freenet mail as such is probably untenable. > 5. A well designed computer program couldn't get past the "think > cash" by knowing either what the questions are and what the > answers should be or doing some simple sort of artificial > intelligence. This is inadequate. We need to assume that artificial intelligence will rapidly improve. I would be thrilled if we could devise an positive-trust system that scales. The solution to freenet mail lies in scalable trust systems! However I can't help but feel that Freenet may not be suitable for messaging in the first place. -- "...you have mistaken your cowardice for common sense and have found comfort in that, deceiving yourselves." Mark Roberts | mjr at statesmean.com _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
