What's stopping David from doing this anyway, with or without the consent of
The Freenet Corporation?  Either people will use it or they won't use it.
Either way it doesn't detract from the usefulness of Freenet.  The only
problem I can (really) see is that it could lead to a widespread
misconception that "freenet ==  www.blah.free" and/or "freenet __only__
works with browser plugins"
Admittedly a little misinformation can do a lot of damage.  But is it worth
hassling him now?  The way I see it, freeweb is just an application rather

Reply via email to