On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 02:02:27PM +1200, David McNab wrote: > Have a closer look at FreeWeb. > It may not have been noticed that it's easy to use FreeWeb in a way which > complies completely with the existing standards - this was true even in the > first prototype.
I have looked closely at FreeWeb - and agree with you that it is a really nice way to create Freesites, indeed I think that FWProxy is very impressive particularly its security features. Please don't misinterpret my criticism of one specific aspect of FreeWeb as a criticism of the software as a whole, I really think it is great. It is because of this that I am arguing so strongly to get rid of a relatively minor feature that, while users aren't forced to use it, could encourage some users to distribute FWProxy-specific URLs which won't work anywhere else without either manual modification of the URL, or installation of your plugin. I can't wait to link to FreeWeb on the Freenet homepage to encourage people to create freesites, but I don't feel I can do this while the fear remains that the freenet userbase
