On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 02:19:36PM +0000, Timm Murray wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 09:36:56PM -0800, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 12:21:18AM -0500, Gianni Johansson wrote:
> > > > I added a ClientDelete command to the node's FCP implementation to
> > > > delete
> > > > keys from the local data store. It takes the admin password and a
> > > > list of
> > > > keys. Note that you must set the admin password, and leave adminPeer
> > > > unset in
> > > > your freenet.conf/ini in order to use it. It only deletes keys that
> > > > you
> > > > explicitly give it. i.e. it won't follow redirects / map files /
> > > > SplitFiles.
> > >
> > > But why would we make it easier for people to censor their own
> > > datastores?
> > It has legitimate uses, even on client side - you insert something with
> > htl0, for testing, and later want it to be more widely distributed...
>
> While this may be a good reason on it's own, I don't see how it can justify
> the possibility of censorship.
Me neither. If you want to test something at htl0, insert some content
you dont care about. When that works, insert the real content with htl>0.
Scott
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020205/e0c90c9b/attachment.pgp>
