On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 04:33:10PM -0500, Travis Bemann wrote: > > One of the reasons to encrypt the store and pack it into one file was > > exactly to prevent node owners to being able to know what's in their > > store. People are harder to sue if they have no possibility to know > > what's in their store. By introducing hooks into the code to select and > > remove certain keys you open up possibilities to selectively remove > > certain keys. > > > > In this case, some governments might make people regularly clean their > > store according to some "black lists". I'd rather not introduce too many > > possibilities to identify and modify keys in one owns store. > > Exactly. This is why not only should ClientDelete be purged from the > repository, but also why Freenet should be modified so that it is as > difficult to READD something like ClientDelete as possible, to make it > all but impossible for them to somehow force us to readd it at some > time in the future.
What do you want us to do, delete all the javadocs? -tc -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 240 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020206/5e30eaaa/attachment.pgp>
