On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 04:44:51PM +0100, Sebastian Sp?th wrote:
> Jasper Jongmans wrote:
> > Maybe we should ClientDelete all pr0n to avoid scaring them away.
>
> One of the reasons to encrypt the store and pack it into one file was
> exactly to prevent node owners to being able to know what's in their
> store. People are harder to sue if they have no possibility to know
> what's in their store. By introducing hooks into the code to select and
> remove certain keys you open up possibilities to selectively remove
> certain keys.
>
> In this case, some governments might make people regularly clean their
> store according to some "black lists". I'd rather not introduce too many
> possibilities to identify and modify keys in one owns store.
Exactly. This is why not only should ClientDelete be purged from the
repository, but also why Freenet should be modified so that it is as
difficult to READD something like ClientDelete as possible, to make it
all but impossible for them to somehow force us to readd it at some
time in the future.
--
Yes, I know my enemies.
They're the teachers who tell me to fight me.
Compromise, conformity, assimilation, submission, ignorance,
hypocrisy, brutality, the elite.
All of which are American dreams.
- Rage Against The Machine
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 1438 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020206/0f35b40f/attachment.pgp>
