On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 04:14:46PM +0100, Oskar Sandberg wrote: > On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 02:18:30PM +0100, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote: > > Tavin Cole <tcole at espnow.com> writes: > > > > > <storePath> could be reinstated but does it really buy you anything over > > > just giving the full path in <nodeFile> and <storeFile>? > > > > Not much. I can't emulate the defaults and make the path > > /var/lib/freenet-unstable/node_<portnr> unless there's special syntax > > for that. I guess what I want is sane defaults -- but it seems under > > Windows the current directory *is* the most sane default. Maybe I'll > > just hack the source for that. > > The whole <portnr> doesn't really make sense in 0.4 because of the way > the node identify themselves. Using a hex of the nodes identity > fingerprint would make a lot more sense.
True. I'd add that you might as well drop it entirely since there can only be one instance of the package installed on the system. -tc _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
