On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 11:24:30AM -0500, Tavin Cole wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 04:14:46PM +0100, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
< > 
> > The whole <portnr> doesn't really make sense in 0.4 because of the way
> > the node identify themselves. Using a hex of the nodes identity
> > fingerprint would make a lot more sense.
> 
> True.  I'd add that you might as well drop it entirely since there can
> only be one instance of the package installed on the system.

Fix that then. It should not only be possible to run several Freenet
nodes on the same system, but in the same JVM instance.

<>
-- 

Oskar Sandberg
oskar at freenetproject.org

_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
Devl at freenetproject.org
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to