On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 08:32:03PM +0100, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 02:09:37PM -0500, Tavin Cole wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 07:16:32PM +0100, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 11:24:30AM -0500, Tavin Cole wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 04:14:46PM +0100, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> > > < > 
> > > > > The whole <portnr> doesn't really make sense in 0.4 because of the way
> > > > > the node identify themselves. Using a hex of the nodes identity
> > > > > fingerprint would make a lot more sense.
> > > > 
> > > > True.  I'd add that you might as well drop it entirely since there can
> > > > only be one instance of the package installed on the system.
> > > 
> > > Fix that then. It should not only be possible to run several Freenet
> > > nodes on the same system, but in the same JVM instance.
> > 
> > You want to overhaul debian's package system to allow multiple
> > installations of the same package?
> 
> No, I want to make it possible to run several instances of Fred on the
> same debian package by starting them with different identities and port 
> numbers.

As you've mentioned before it shouldn't take too much
modification to run several Freds in the same JVM.  Of course you can do
this in different JVMs.  But it is of little consequence if the default files
installed by the debian package aren't named by that convention.

-tavin


_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
Devl at freenetproject.org
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to