On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 11:44:07PM +0100, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 04:35:07PM -0500, Tavin Cole wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 01:14:51PM +0100, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 10:00:11PM -0500, Travis Bemann wrote:
> > > > Some people have been reportedly able to get the latest snapshot of
> > > > Freenet (20020119) to work with Kaffe, but I have not been able to get
> > > > it to work properly. Here's the log generated by my attempt to get
> > > > the latest snapshot to work with Kaffe 1.0.6:
> > >
> > > I do use Kaffe, but I don't use Kaffe's servlet stuff, I got that from
> > > the Apache stuff in CVS (it's Free software as well, just under a dumb
> > > license).
> >
> > The Apache license is basically just a BSD-style license. It's more
> > Free than the GPL.
>
> It's pointless to argue about licenses here. The GPL is not optimal
> because it censors people from releasing only compiled code on modified
> versions, but the BSD license is not optimal either since it doesn't
> take the opportunity to stop people from claiming censorship rights over
> modified versions. There is no truly free license around AFAIK ("This
> data may be modified and distributed in any form, under the condition
> these rights are not reverted from the modified version or copy").
Public domain?
> By "dumb" above I meant GPL incompatible.
In what way? We're not restricted from distributing it with Fred.
-tc
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
Devl at freenetproject.org
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
