At 10.11 21/01/02 +0100, you wrote: >On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 05:03:07PM -0800, Scott G. Miller wrote: > > > > these rights are not reverted from the modified version or copy"). > > > > > > Public domain? > > No, you can take public domain code, modify it and close source it. What > > Oskar wants is a non-infective GPL (closer to the LGPL or MPL). > >No, what I want is an "infective" GPL without any requirements on the >format of derived works - people can release it in any way they want, >but they still have to let me copy and edit it (even if I have to do so >with a hex editor).
It will be quite interesting (at least for me) to know the exact status of the project licensing. I remember to be told that the project "was under GPL, were under GLP and always will be under GPL" In my opiniont this is a main question; don't do the same error (IMHO) that is perpetuated for Mixmaster or other crypto stuff ! Is for this reason that the site is not unde GFDL (or any other license scheme AFAIK)? Marco * Marco A. Calamari marco at freenetproject.org * il Progetto Freenet - segui il coniglio bianco the Freenet Project - follow the white rabbit _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
