On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 03:46:12AM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > Thus we need > to release 0.5rc2 IMHO.
Is this really that necessary? I have been inserting away happily for a while now with rc1. If there is a *really* good reason then we should do this ASAP and test it HARD with inserts. What is the liklihood of a regression with this bugfix? Can you get Oskar to do some detailed code review of your modifications to minimize the possibility of a regression. > a) Do we include the desperation-mode-routing changes? This adds a > second pass in TreeRouting if the first one fails, in which it will try > backed off nodes and nodes with a low CP. I would keep pre-0.5 changes to an absolute minimum, unless we absolutely need it - don't change it. > b) Do we up the minimum build, now or soon? What are the pros and cons? My gut says no, at least not for a week or two. Ian. -- Ian Clarke ian@[freenetproject.org|locut.us|cematics.com] Latest Project http://cematics.com/kanzi Personal Homepage http://locut.us/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021025/ba999869/attachment.pgp>
