On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 09:16:19PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 03:46:12AM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > Thus we need > > to release 0.5rc2 IMHO. > > Is this really that necessary? I have been inserting away happily > for a while now with rc1. One thing that would be disastrous would be more rc1 nodes. But not immediately disastrous, only when they accumulate enough refs. It's insidious. > > If there is a *really* good reason then we should do this ASAP and test > it HARD with inserts. > > What is the liklihood of a regression with this bugfix? Can you get The basic bugfix? I don't see how it could possibly cause any problems. > Oskar to do some detailed code review of your modifications to minimize > the possibility of a regression. It's a tiny change. > > > a) Do we include the desperation-mode-routing changes? This adds a > > second pass in TreeRouting if the first one fails, in which it will try > > backed off nodes and nodes with a low CP. > > I would keep pre-0.5 changes to an absolute minimum, unless we > absolutely need it - don't change it. With rc1 nodes around, we do need it unfortunately. Without, it's just nice to have. > > > b) Do we up the minimum build, now or soon? > > What are the pros and cons? My gut says no, at least not for a week or > two. No way. RC1 is FUCKED. > > Ian. > > -- > Ian Clarke ian@[freenetproject.org|locut.us|cematics.com] > Latest Project http://cematics.com/kanzi > Personal Homepage http://locut.us/
-- Matthew Toseland toad at amphibian.dyndns.org amphibian at users.sourceforge.net Freenet/Coldstore open source hacker. Employed full time by Freenet Project Inc. from 11/9/02 to 11/11/02. http://freenetproject.org/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021026/66f1d47a/attachment.pgp>
