On Saturday 26 October 2002 09:25, mt wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 09:16:19PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 03:46:12AM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > > Thus we need > > > to release 0.5rc2 IMHO. > > > > Is this really that necessary? I have been inserting away happily > > for a while now with rc1. > > One thing that would be disastrous would be more rc1 nodes. But not > immediately disastrous, only when they accumulate enough refs. It's > insidious.
Ian: This kind of problem points out why it is nescessary to do a forced upgrade to the release candidate node and then, test for a prolonged period (like a week). If you test on a network with mixed versions you don't really know if the release candidate code is working. --gj _______________________________________________ devl mailing list devl at freenetproject.org http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
